Thomas v. Backgroundchecks.com – $18 million settlement
CLA resolved FCRA claims for a class of about 430,000 consumers who Backgroundchecks.com failed to properly notify when it sold employment background checks about them. The settlement resulted in Backgroundchecks.com paying $18 million from which class members received a portion.
Thomas v. FTS USA, LLC – $1.3 million settlement
CLA represented a class of applicants and employees against FTS USA for FCRA violations when it obtained and used background checks. The case went to trial before a jury and resulted in a class settlement of $1,300,000 during trial.
Ellis v. Swift Transportation – $5.5 million settlement
CLA represented two separate classes of employees and applicants of Swift Transportation for failures in its obtaining background checks on those individuals. The resulting settlement provided $5,053,500 to benefit class members.
Henderson v. Acxiom – $20.8 million settlement
In a groundbreaking settlement against one of the largest data aggregators in the United States, CLA represented a class of consumers on whom Acxiom ran employment background checks without giving them proper notice. The case resulted in a class settlement...
Milbourne v. JRK Residential – $375,000 settlement
CLA represented a class of approximately 1,105 employees and applicants challenging JRK’s obtaining and using of background checks. The case went to trial before a jury and resulted in a class settlement of $375,000 during trial.
Marcum v. Dolgencorp – $4.08 million settlement
CLA represented a class of applicants and employees challenging Dollar General’s obtaining and use of background checks as part of its hiring process. The settlement resulted in Dollar General changing its application procedures nationally as well as paying $4,080,000 into...
Henderson v. Verifications, Inc. – $3.6 million settlement
CLA resolved the FCRA claims of approximately 41,049 individuals alleging Verifications failed to properly notify them when reporting certain information to employers and for failing to properly investigate consumers’ disputes of inaccurate reporting. The two-part settlement paid one group from...